9/11 Reports

102 posts / 0 new
Last post
mmphosis
Fidel

[url=Bill">http://www.opednews.com/Diary/Bill-Moyers-Bashes-9-11-Tr-by-Saman-Mohamm... Moyers Bashes 9/11 Truth, Yet Still Says That Facts Matter[/url]

Quote:
Former PBS broadcaster Bill Moyers, with all his influence and prestige, publicly derided 9/11 truth activists, and supported the official myth in a speech he gave in New York on January 27, 2011.
Of all people, Moyers should know the power of myths in human society, and that a myth is not the truth. "Myths are public dreams," said Joseph Campbell. In America, where tricksters and thieves have total government power in their hands, and rule over the public mind with propaganda and other techniques of collective brainwashing, the only truth that is allowed to be expressed is their truth.

Saman "Truth Excavator" Mohammadi of Toronto, Ontario goes on to say:

Quote:
If Orwell were alive today, he would not mock 9/11 truth, but research all the evidence, and then let it all hang out.

Let it all hang out, Saman, let it all hang out. Truth deniers want us to believe that the information is all out in the open, and then bash anyone who tries to discuss it. The truth is that certain facts about 9/11 have been carefully guarded by government minders and officially declared off limits to the public since 9/11. What are they hiding?

jas

The really funny thing for me is, what do they think they're hiding? Buildings the size of the Twin Towers? Two steel-framed towers, each almost a half a kilometre high, collapsing completely to the ground in under 15 seconds, from one-hour upper floor fires.

And then a third building, 7 hours later.

And all three buildings just happen to be the only steel-framed buildings in history ever to collapse completely from fires! All on the same day!

What a coincidence!

Fidel

jas wrote:

The really funny thing for me is, what do they think they're hiding? Buildings the size of the Twin Towers? Two steel-framed towers, each almost a half a kilometre high, collapsing completely to the ground in under 15 seconds, from one-hour upper floor fires.

Mr Osama bin Laden apparently confessed to orchrestrating the deed. He said something to the effect that even his experience did not lead him to believe that the "iron" framed towers would collapse below the impacted floors. And what was his experience? Apparently Osama was educated in civil engineering. He should know that skyscrapers are not framed with iron but by steel beams and columns. He also stated that they expected fires from jet fuel to weaken the upper floors enough to cause collapse. Most civil engineers wouldn't even come to that conclusion. The bin Laden videos were obviously fakes. Elvis bin Laden is a myth created by the CIA and US Military dictatorship in order to pacify sheeple.

mmphosis

MICHAEL FULLERTON: A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse (veteranstoday.com)

A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse (ae911truth.org)

Full Article (foreignpolicyjournal.com)

By Michael Fullerton

mmphosis
Fidel

mmphosis wrote:

Has the National Post declared a fatwa on 9/11 studies? (rabble.ca)
by Joshua Blakeny

Mr. Kay also admonished my thesis supervisor Professor Antony Hall, stating: "as long as he keeps it [9/11 Studies] out of the classroom, he's free to believe in whatever [. . .] he likes." This was a curious decree from the editorial offices of the National Post; if the conflicting interpretations of the most seminal event in contemporary history are not to be broached in the classrooms of Canadian universities, where can they be?

History departments dedicate much time and energy to analyzing the origins of historic wars such as WWI and WWII. Why should we shy away from questioning the origins of the Global War on Terror? Mr. Kay's article backfired. I was actually quite pleased that Mr. Kay cited the passage from my letter of intent which legitimizes rather than discredits the academic field of 9/11 studies.

I don't think any serious intellectual would join Mr. Kay and his co-thinkers at Maclean's On Campus -- the latter of whom used my scholarship as a case study to argue that universities should be fully privatized -- and designate my research proposal unworthy of modest public funding...

Jesus Christ! The long arm of the American Inquisition Inc. really does reach into Canada.

The lies underlying 9/11 are known and documented. The public's compliance with the crusade against evil is not based on any analysis or rational understanding of the facts.

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJftglWFUBM]Joshua Blakeney and Anthony J. Hall Investigate Michael Shermer's Academic Credentials(YouTube)[/url]  Blakeney accused of heresy - Shermer a fraud and disinformation jockey for the US Military dictatorship

mmphosis

9/11 Interactive Timeline (national911memorial.org)

Quote:
Warning: The timeline contains graphic images and sensitive content due to the nature of events related to the September 11, 2001 attacks.

September 11th Interactive Timeline by Archetype (archetype-inc.com)

 

Fidel

@#58

Well that's not right. Since the Moussaoui trial, the FBI stopped supporting Ted Olson's claim that he spoke with his wife, former CNN reporter Barbara Olson. Either Olson was lying or he was duped into thinking that his wife was speaking with him on the phone. All in all there is no evidence that flight 77 returned to Washington. No evidence for boxcutter wielding Arabs terrorizing Americans in the sky.

And that AA 77 flew into the Pentagon is pure fairy tale in a number of ways. First thing they do is hide the video evidence from public access. Then they wanted us to believe that burning jet fuel vaporized aluminum plane sections and all traces of stainless steel Rolls Royce jet engines, but not all those body parts left behind by a discriminating inferno as if by a mind of its own.

jas

Fidel wrote:

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJftglWFUBM]Joshua Blakeney and Anthony J. Hall Investigate Michael Shermer's Academic Credentials(YouTube)[/url]  

This doesn't surprise me at all. So many of these self-proclaimed skeptics are complete quacks. Their "debunking" consists almost entirely of making absurd statements about their opponents and arguments, including slander, presumably in the hopes of provoking an angry reaction.

Adjunct professor means part-time contract instructor. He's not in economics, he's in "Transdisciplinary studies", and not every term, by the looks of it. Strange that he made no attempt to correct that misnomer, and apparently some of his earlier web entries had made the same claim.

Neither the dean of Economics nor the President of Claremont Graduate University had ever heard of him. Looks like Stephen Barrett all over again.

Fidel

 

jas wrote:
Strange that he made no attempt to correct that misnomer, and apparently some of his earlier web entries had made the same claim.

Neither the dean of Economics nor the President of Claremont Graduate University had ever heard of him. Looks like Stephen Barrett all over again.

And then, at 10:25 of the video,  Shermer tries to turn the tables on Blakeney and Hall and make it look like they've accused him of being a disinformation jockey, which they did not. They merely asked him if he lied about his adjunct professorship at Claremont University. Obviously he didn't want to admit to lying, and so he tries to make them appear foolish for even asking. If his resume is a pack of lies, then that makes him an established liar and a fraud and probably a disinformation jockey WRT 9/11 at the same time. The inquisitors are so sure of themselves that they don't even consider that truth oriented people will scrutinize their parade of lies. Like a relative whose passed on would have said about someone like Shermer, he's got more nerve than Dick Tracy.

 

jas

Well, I think you're overstating it here, Fidel. I don't think his resume is a pack of lies. But he was lying or at least not correcting the misperception that he's a professor of economics at Claremont Graduate University.

I think the video is a great example of the juvenile tactics and utter lack of substance of his and many others' "arguments" against 9/11 inquiry.

Fidel

Yes I did overstate his penchant for lying. But if he is deceptive about claiming to have adjunct professorship at Claremont, is Shirmer also being deceptive in regard to 9/11? Shirmer's definitely down a peg or two in my regard for him, and I wasn't even aware of who he is until this thread. All I do know about him is that Shirmer has shown that he is deceptive. For some reason I take him a lot less seriously already.

mmphosis
mmphosis

9/11 is revisited (gulf-daily-news.com)
By Paul Balles

Fidel

mmphosis wrote:

9/11 is revisited (gulf-daily-news.com)
By Paul Balles

6. The story that incriminating evidence was found in alleged hijacker Mohammed Atta's luggage was a revision of the original story

After arriving an hour before takeoff in Boston, why was Atta's the only luggage of 81 passengers not loaded on to AA Flight 11?

Even more mysterious, why did Mohammed Atta, an engineer educated in Germany whom his family described as being averse to air travel and requiring medication for airsickness and not very religious,  drive all the way to Portland the day before 9/11 and necessitating an additional  early morning flight back to Boston before hopping an am flight to Heaven? Is that the way they planned it over five years?  What was so important that Flight 11's designated Qaeda pilot would risk the New Pearl Harbor attack against them who love to make a killing by all things military and warfiteering?

[url=9/11">http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/phone_link_twist_HhjY4vbIl1... phone link twist[/url]

NYPost.com wrote:
The FBI hasn't been able to substantiate claims that 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta got a call from a United Airlines worker's cellphone on the day of the attacks, The Post has learned.

A Justice Department letter obtained yesterday says that while details of the probe "are protected from disclosure . . . the FBI has found no credible evidence to support this allegation."

Doubt continues to grow after all these years. I don't think they have any real proof Atta was even on the plane. I think it's possible he was dead before AA-11 took off from Boston. He could even turn up alive somewhere as have a number of the alleged hijackers.

Fidel

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Himmler#The_plan]The Plan[/url]

Quote:
On 22 August, Adolf Hitler told his generals:“  "I will provide a propagandistic casus belli. Its credibility doesn't matter. The victor will not be asked whether he told the truth."  ”

mmphosis

mmphosis

9/11 FEMA videographer at Ground Zero goes public (2009) (voltairenet.org)

El perseguido (2009) (editorialplaneta.com.ar)
by Kurt Sonnenfeld

clandestiny

two easy-to-see conjob tricks mister pig has pulled on the Gabardene Swine- ahem, i mean the human race!

1) Jack the Ripper story. Probably the most famouse serial killer in history; for several reasons. The five East End killings took place at dawn of public literacy, when 'penny dreadful' newspapers were common, and everybody, from local fishwives to the Queen, read them. Also, Tom bullers (sp) a hack journalist, made up the 'jack the ripper' name and sent letters signed 'jack' to the police. The name captured public interest in years after the event- literally hundred of books and movies based upon 'jack the ripper' have since enriched upper class twits! Fact: the 'gentlemen' who ran the police and newpapers in 1880 London knew the prude queen Victoria (she bathed in full dress, being shocked even at idea of nakedness- and her stench was famous among her servants long after her death!) would be angry at idea the Whitechapel murderer, named john druitt, who sodomised his poor victims, was a 'public schoolboy' ie a 'gentleman'...it was much easier to allow the fiction they didn't know who was killing the women to continue. When it later got out of hand, creating panic and terror, the Scotland Yard boss cop sent a memo around telling local cops the killer was already dead. When His grandaughter released the actual memo in 1959, by accident, the date of memo was TWO WEEKS before john Druitt's body was recovered from Thames!  lol. The story 'ran away' on the idiot liars (btw, the fact is the police probably killed Druitt, then threw his body into Thames...Druitt's family had told Scot yard that he was the killer days before Mary kelly's death. IOW, the police were idiots, and had to hide their selfish incompetence.... besides, who really cared? It was a good story as a 'mystery', and made alot of rich kids alot of money over the years, indeed as late as 2003!

The Titanic: The Titanic, like all passenger ships in victorian times, was basically a floating prison to its 3rd class passengers. The entire 'women and kids first' story came from Walter lord, who, as a child of nine, crossed the sea with his family, on the Olympia, which was Titanic's sister ship. Iow, he was ONE OF THEM! The Titanic had 20 lifeboats, and 2200 people, 900 of them, crewmen. She hit the berg at twenty to midnight, and sank outta sight at 0220 am. The people KNEW she was sinking right away- and the rich panicked, stealing away on first 13 of lifeboats (one lifeboat had 15 upper class men in it when rescued by Carpathia next moring!) Like the Jack the ripper story, the Titanic disaster exposed the injustice of wealth, and Mister Pig has been lying like a rat ever since Oct of 1912! Walter Lord fabricated entire the bs about the band, playing 'stairways to heaven' as she sank, or the whopper about the 'gentlemen' such as Astor and Guggenheim etc playing poker as Titanic stood up on end!....also, 2 lifeboats disappeared that night, and, one story published in the 1930's  by a crewman survivor said that one of the lifeboats was pulled down with Titanic,, and MOST OF THE 130 1st class men lost were aboard that lifeboat!

Both these stories are still going strong, and James cameron made A FORTUNE retelling e big lie in his goofy movie. The reality is TOTALLY DIFFERENT from the myths....and the myths serve Mister pig by making him look good when the fact was, the bastards were cowardly punks motivated by white racism and ignorance greed etc.

The WTC scandal was nothing compared to the trick of blaming the 'Iron Curtain' and 'cold war' on the poor old Soviet Union- which had a SIGNED AGREEMENT with FDR to share in postwar reconstruction monies ie the MARSHAL PLAN....but FDR was by murdered to put stooge Truman into WHouse office just in time....the 'cold war' nonsense has cost humanity tens of $trillions and is almost certainly the worst lie ever told by anyone, in all of history. And still the ratfinks get away with it! (see 'the king's speech)

Fidel

clandestiny wrote:
The WTC scandal was nothing compared to the trick of blaming the 'Iron Curtain' and 'cold war' on the poor old Soviet Union- which had a SIGNED AGREEMENT with FDR to share in postwar reconstruction monies ie the MARSHAL PLAN....but FDR was by murdered to put stooge Truman into WHouse office just in time....the 'cold war' nonsense has cost humanity tens of $trillions and is almost certainly the worst lie ever told by anyone, in all of history. And still the ratfinks get away with it! (see 'the king's speech)

I think it was Karl Polanyi who said that the Marshall Plan was planned - planning was not. Kidding. I'm of the opine that they don't give a rat's patootey about us ordinary slobs. We're so much mud on their shoes to be scraped off before stepping on fine carpets and marble flooring imported from Italy. We're just common rabble.

WTC-7? It fell to the ground almost seven hours after the collapses of the trade towers. Some say it fell to the ground in a hurry in 6.6 seconds. Others say anywhere from 9 to 16 seconds if including the initial collapse of one section of the building. Keep in mind that the NIST finally admitted to several stories of free fall over at least three seconds. A bowling ball dropped from 47 WTC-7 stories would have taken six seconds to hit the ground. Aside from regularity of nature, scientists operate on the principle that similar effects generally imply similar causes. Scientists tend not not to want to declare unprecedented causes for common phenomena. And yet, no steel frame office building over ten stories ever collapsed due to fire before or after 9/11.

prisonernumberone prisonernumberone's picture

Hi .... nice to see 9/11 truth still struggling along....

anywhoo  Dr. Judy Wood has released/published a textbook sized book on her examination of evidence......

For starters, to my understanding, it is the most comprehensive reporting about the day, beyond that, the scope of her examination includes the chronicling  of unprecedented phenomena never before seen before that day and which more timid souls shy away from because they fear the hobgoblins (trolls?)of peer pressure.

Where Did the Towers Go?

and remember she is pointing at the moon don't stare at her finger

bob

mmphosis

WTC Attack September 11, 2001 from New York Police Helicopter (youtube.com)

Note: youtube requires you to login to view the video, and they now require you to link your old youtube account to a google account

Quote:

The whole tower, it's gone, Holy crap, they knocked the whole fricking thing down.

Quote:

How could it go down?

New 9/11 helicopter video of Twin Towers released (bbc.co.uk)

mmphosis
Fidel

[url=http://pubrecord.org/law/9192/wants-military-commission-trials/]Why The American Inquisition Wants Show Trials For 9/11 Suspects[/url]

Quote:
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers statement concentrated on the faults of the military commissions themselves, headlining their press release, "At Guantanamo, "Detainees Are Presumed Guilty":

"Despite some cosmetic changes since the Bush-era commissions, the commission rules still permit the government to introduce secret evidence, hearsay and statements obtained through coercion," said the association's Executive Director, Norman Reimer. "NACDL maintains that the rules and procedures for these commission trials raise serious questions about the government's commitment to constitutional principles upon which our country was founded. "

By coercion they mean torture and all around disregard for legal procedures and truth in general.

The Inquisition was created in the 12th century. It lasted for more than four hundred years and was built on this same logic.

It was a consensus imposed by the ruling feudal order, and its goal was to prop-up wicked despots and endless babbling brigades of yes-men in absolute power.

jas

Interview with Tony Szamboti on CKUW 95.9 FM Winnipeg

 

mmphosis
mmphosis
jas

This article is over a year old. Is there some reason you're posting it now?

There is plenty of more current stuff available on 9/11 Blogger.

Also, the Washington Times is not the Washington Post.

Noah_Scape

But don't confuse "this article" [MSM questions 9 11 story] with the original thread-starter WikiLeaks news which is current.

And stunning, for the uninitiated who have only heard the MSM and Official Account of 9 11.

For us CTs [conspiracy theorists] and Troofers there is news too - I had not heard that anyone actually picked up pieces of NanoThermite, those "red chips" that burn so hot if you put a match to them. Ah, so, they have them as evidence.

But instead of a good discussion we get sarcasm and off-topic personal squabbles with the site policy on thread topics and blather about whateverelse.

BLATHER, I say! C'mon Babblers, RAGE - this is 9 11 we are talkin' bout. The wars, the police, the price paid in so many ways for allowing the lies to continue unchallenged in any meaningfull way.

YES their names are George and Donald and Dick!!

YES it will happen again unless we get the truth out [the 9 11 truth, not the alt news site, but that too].

 

And even if it wasn't a conspiracy, the fact that they found Thermite should cue up some thoughts:

  Have you considered the idea that the 9 11 freefalling buildings should tell us that MANY MOST OR ALL tall buildings in cities everywhere are fitted with explosives in case of a potential structural failure - if they tipped over sideways the damage would be 100 times greater.  I surely do remember what I was thinking as I watched TV that 9 11 morning - "gee, if that falls over SIDEWAYS it will really be a mess". [didn't you?]

 

 

al-Qa'bong

Sideways.  Really?

Well, maybe in a cartoon this could happen, but I'm sure one of the eminent scientists cited above would tell you that gravity tends to have an effect on falling objects.  Even if some fiendish bomber were to have blown out the second floor of the towers, and the towers started to lean a few degrees, the material on every floor, from staplers to girders, would still be drawn STRAIGHT DOWN, and the structure would collapse accordingly.

Carry on.

Bec.De.Corbin Bec.De.Corbin's picture

I don't know... if you'd blow out the basment and foundations the right way you might get a more sideways "fall". It might not fall like a tree but it would still fall more out side it's foot print.

al-Qa'bong

It might "tip" for about half a second, then everything would fall straight toward the centre of the earth.

The only way a WTC tower could have tipped over is if a UFO had clamped onto its penthouse with a skyhook and pulled it over sideways. 

Fidel

Ya buildings never topple over  when following natural laws of conservation of momentum. 9/11 is the rule.

And besides, anything that sounds remotely anti-US or anti-Anglo-American must be conspiracy theory. Always defer to a bunch of known war criminals as your baseline for truth and work the coincidence theory from there.

Bec.De.Corbin Bec.De.Corbin's picture

 

And every one of those buildings in the picture had their foundations damaged in an earthquake (or sinkhole?)... Not from airliners crashing into their upper floors causing massive fires. I believe the first WTC bombers were trying to do exactly that: damage the foundation so bad the one tower would topple over. Their bomb wasn't big enough or placed in the proper place; they failed.

 

Fidel

Except that no one has shown how the plane impacts or fires alone were the initial cause of collapse in either tower. All trade centre buildings were still standing for some time after the planes hit as they were over designed for. The lower "parts A" of both towers were overdesigned to withstand a 2000 percent increase in live loads. The 1500 architects and engineers for truth also point to the lack of deceleration within the first few seconds that would indicate a sudden jolt as would be expected by Newtonian laws of physics. There is no deceleration evident from videos, and so the magnitude of force is not multiplied over the lower sections on impact the way the official fairy tale explains things, or rather neglects to explain as per US laws regulating the handling of building disasters and federal crime scenes in general. There was tilting of WTC2(the south tower) by as much as 23 degrees just before falling through the path of most resistance. Several aspects of the initial collapses are what defied laws of nature. They were the worst building collapses in history, and 1500 architects and engineers are wanting to know exactly what causes collapse initiation and subsequent acceleration of the building into a pile of pulverized concrete and mass of twisted metal complete with pools of molten iron viewed before and after the collapses.

Bec.De.Corbin wrote:
I believe the first WTC bombers were trying to do exactly that: damage the foundation so bad the one tower would topple over. Their bomb wasn't big enough or placed in the proper place; they failed.

That's a good question. And normally, in a country that wrote the book on forensic science and legal procedures, we might know a lot more than we do today. Far more money was spent investigating the Lockerbie bombing and trials only to come to a very partisan conclusion. It all depends on where they want to place blame for reasons that are politically expedient and less to do with discovering truth. Torture and truth are also incompatible themes in general. Most countries realize now that the USSA is corrupt to the core and not operating on the basis of law and order all of the time. 9/11 and monetary meltdown have really damaged the USA's international credibility even among friendly nations.

How the FBI (and RCMP) protected al-Qaeda's hijacking specialist 

mmphosis
Bec.De.Corbin Bec.De.Corbin's picture

Right, asking drunk college people at a St Patricks Day parade about 9-11... I'd love to see the raw footage, you know the footage where the drunks tell them to go fuck off.

B9sus4 B9sus4's picture

"Could this be what the Troofers have been patiently and piously waiting for.."

Troofers. The vituperative "truther", itself an insult, wasn't offensive enough for you so you had to compound it with the doubly offensive construction "troofer". Apparently you feel you have some inherent right to insult people you don't agree with. Fine. Thus I claim the same right. Thus I claim I have the right to insult people who disagree with me. I think people who oppose truth are "untruthers". Untruth is usually known as lie. Therefore an "untruther" is a liar. However, that in itself isn't egregious enough to equal the insult "troofer", which a vituperative phrasing of a vituperative. Therefore I call those who oppose those who seek the truth damned ignorant liars. Is that perhaps insulting enough for you? If not I'm sure I could ramp it up a bit to equal your own level of untastefulness.

mmphosis
mmphosis
mmphosis

Was There an Alternative?
Looking Back on 9/11 a Decade Later

By Noam Chomsky

Tomgram: Noam Chomsky, The Imperial Mentality and 9/11 (tomdispatch.com)

wage zombie

mmphosis wrote:

Was There an Alternative?
Looking Back on 9/11 a Decade Later

By Noam Chomsky

Tomgram: Noam Chomsky, The Imperial Mentality and 9/11 (tomdispatch.com)

Great read, thanks!

Fidel

Lapdog Media Embrace Imperialists' "Blowback" theory

Yes Elvis bin Laden and al-CIA'duh were once with us, but then they went against us! 

According to FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, the most gagged woman in U.S. history, the imperialists' blowback theory is more Grade-A U.S. Government bullshit. They were always partners and still are today. 

Quote:
 Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds dropped a bombshell on the Mike Malloy radio show, guest-hosted by Brad Friedman (audio, partial transcript).
In the interview, Sibel says that the US maintained 'intimate relations' with Bin Laden, and the Taliban, "all the way until that day of September 11."

These 'intimate relations' included using Bin Laden for 'operations' in Central Asia, including Xinjiang, China. These 'operations' involved using al Qaeda and the Taliban in the same manner "as we did during the Afghan and Soviet conflict," that is, fighting 'enemies' via proxies.

As Sibel has previously described, and as she reiterates in this latest interview, this process involved using Turkey (with assistance from 'actors from Pakistan, and Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia') as a proxy, which in turn used Bin Laden and the Taliban and others as a proxy terrorist army.

MegB

Some babble history:

September 11th, 2001

September 12th, 2001

These threads and posts hit me on a number of levels ...

mmphosis

On Wikipedia, 9/11 Dissent Is Kept on the Fringe (nytimes.com)

On Wikipedia, Echoes of 9/11 ‘Edit Wars’
by Noam Cohen

wage zombie

Frontline, NYT, Maddow, 60 Min. all report CIA cover-up on 9/11 terrorists

Quote:

For some reason, most of the progressive blogs are deep-sixing the important news surrounding the publication of former FBI Special Agent Ali Soufan's new book, The Black Banners: The Inside Story of 9/11 and the War Against al-Qaeda. There are two crucial reasons to pay attention to this media event.

One: Soufan makes clear that his interrogations of Al Qaeda-suspected terrorists was interrupted multiple times by the CIA or Pentagon higher-ups in order to implement torture techniques as part of the interrogation, something that ultimately drove the FBI away from the interrogation scene at Guantanamo and elsewhere.

Two: Soufan makes clear that the CIA on multiple occasions blocked information on reaching him and other FBI agents relating to foreknowledge of Al Qaeda-suspected terrorists, including one involved in the USS Cole attack, entering the United States. Even more, they lied about informing the FBI about this, and they lied to the FBI about their even having knowledge of a major terrorist summit in Malyasia in 2000, where the 9/11 plot was presumably discussed.

mmphosis
M. Spector M. Spector's picture

Rebecca West wrote:

Some babble history:

September 11th, 2001

Here's a link that actually works: [url=http://archive.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=2&t=00029... 11, 2001[/url]

Fidel

Is The War on Terror a Hoax?

Where are have all the shoe, shampoo, and panty bombers gone? We are wide open to terrorist acts where many more people could be killed far more easily than occurred during the 9/11 Gladio extravaganza to launch 10 year's worth of glorious warfiteering, and yet where are they? Where are all the US Military-trained hijackers and terrorizers now?

Why are some of us just incapable of living in fear of the al-CIA'duh bogeyman? Apparently we lack faith.

Pages

Topic locked