rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Yukon senator decides on territory's (and his) best interests

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Well, Danny done gone and said it.

He stood up in an interview with the CBC on July 28 and said: "We did not become the country we are today in spite of our political institutions. We became the country we are today because of our political institutions."

Oh, forgive me, you probably don't know Danny. Most Yukoners do, however. That is because Dan Lang is the senator for the Yukon, appointed by Harper back in 2008.

Yukoners call him Danny. Some do so not out of familiarity, but out of belittlement. 

Along with the other 17 senators appointed in that year, he agreed to an eight-year term.

Let's see, 2008 plus eight years brings us to 2016. But to everyone's surprise that eight-year term is but voluntary.

Danny now says he will make a decision on stepping down that is "in the best interests of the Yukon."

And who determines the Yukon's best senatorial interests? Why, Danny, of course. If the unelected Yukon senator with incredible job security cannot determine what's good for the Yukon, no one can. At least that seems to be the attitude on display.

It looks like he's setting himself up as senator for life, or at least until retirement at age 75 -- which is another eight long years away. 

The Senate isn't too popular in the Yukon. This is mostly due to a piece of legislation known as Bill S-6. It changed the environmental assessment process in the Yukon.

Some of the changes were not welcomed by First Nations and the environmental community. 

The environmental assessment process in the Yukon is a result of the modern-day Umbrella Final Agreement and 11 treaties signed between Yukon First Nations and the federal government.  

Bill S-6 is seen as going against the spirit and intent of the Umbrella Final Agrement. The changes are seen as an affront to Yukon First Nations and all Yukoners. 

Also of major concern is that the changes could lead to resource extraction projects being rushed through environmental assessment reviews.

The odd thing was that this federal bill was introduced in the Senate, not the Commons, and Danny introduced it.

One would think that a bill that makes projects that will negatively impact the land (upon which so many Yukoners depend and respect) potentially easier to go through the environmental assessment process would start in the Commons. This could have made it more accountable, although the Yukon's MP (Conservative Ryan Leef) did bring a Commons Committee to the Yukon to hear concerns. 

Despite this Committee hearing, many Yukon First Nations and other Yukoners speak out against aspects of Bill S-6, and because of the Conservative majority in the Commons, Bill S-6 was easily approved and has obtained Royal Assent.

That means it is now the law of the land. Or the Yukon. And all thanks to that Senate Bill S-6.

So the Yukon finds itself being shaped by a political institution whose appointed member decides for himself what is in the best interest of the territory. 

Most Yukoners like to think of themselves as part of a democratic Canadian federation in spite of our political institutions.

Maybe, just maybe, all Yukoners should have a say in determining what is in our best interests. 

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.