The NDP is refusing to heed a call from 200 well-known musicians, academics, trade unionists, and party members to withdraw from the Canada-Israel Interparliamentary Group (CIIG). To justify its decision, the party says it is also represented on the Canada-Palestine Parliamentary Friendship Group (CPPFG).
In response to the open letter signed by public figures and activists like Roger Waters, Maher Arar, Noam Chomsky, and Linda McQuaig that calls on NDP MPs to withdraw from CIIG, anti-Palestinian groups jumped to the party's defence. In a Canadian Jewish News article about the open letter, CIIG chair Michael Levitt -- a former board member of the Zionist organization Jewish National Fund and co-author of a recent statement that cited "Hamas incitement" and blamed Palestinians for Israeli forces' shooting thousands of peaceful protesters, including Canadian doctor Tarek Loubani -- called CIIG executives Murray Rankin and Randall Garrison "mensches" and said he's "very supportive" of their role in the group. For its part, the staunchly anti-Palestinian Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center (FSWC) released a statement defending "the federal NDP's decision to not withdraw from the Canada-Israel Interparliamentary Group despite pressure from party members."
In response to the open letter, NDP officials told the Huffington Post, Hill Times, and others they were also represented on CPPFG. Caucus Press Secretary Kathryn LeBlanc sent me a statement noting, "NDP MPs belong to both the Canada-Israel Interparliamentary Group and the Canada-Palestine Parliamentary Friendship Group. The NDP believes dialogue is the way forward to establish peace, security and justice for Palestinian and Israeli people."
But, the claim that belonging to these two committees creates some sort of neutral balance between Israelis and Palestinians conjures up famed South African activist Desmond Tutu's insight that "if you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality."
In the case of South African apartheid, the NDP supported boycotts, divestment and sanctions against South Africa to put non-violent pressure on the country and end a regime that oppressed millions.
The NDP's claim that belonging to both committees creates balance or "dialogue" is disingenuous at best.
The Canada-Palestine Parliamentary Friendship Group (CPPFG) isn't one of17 official parliamentary associations or groups, so it doesn't receive public support, unlike the Canada-Israel group. Without official parliamentary status, the CPPFG has few resources and little influence. Established in 2007, it went defunct and was only re-constituted last year with nine MPs, including one initial NDP member. At least one more NDP MP has joined since the re-launch. The CIIG group, on the other hand, was created in 1981 and has 88 MPs and Senators, including four NDP members.
CIIG works with a sister organization in Israel, the 13-member Israel-Canada Inter-Parliamentary Friendship Group. The two groups organize joint teleconferences and delegations to each other's parliaments. As I detailed, the co-chairs of the Israel-Canada Inter-Parliamentary Friendship Group, Yoel Hasson and Anat Berko, are stridently anti-Palestinian.
CPPFG, on the other hand, works with representatives of a people without control of territory and whose politicians are often locked in Israeli jails. Dozens of the Palestinian representatives who Israel detains can't "dialogue" with their NDP counterparts through CPPFG. A recent CPPFG-inspired Canadian parliamentary delegation to the West Bank was unable to meet with Palestinian Legislative Council member Khalida Jarrar, whose daughters have been active in Palestine solidarity campaigning in Canada, since she has been detained by Israel for most of the past three years and has been blocked from traveling internationally since 1998.
It's unclear if the Canadian MPs would have been allowed to meet Jarrar even if she weren't detained by Israel, since she is a member of the secular leftist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). Like most Palestinian political organizations, the PFLP is a banned terrorist organization in Canada. Ottawa's post-September 11 terrorist list makes it illegal to assist the PFLP, Palestine Liberation Front, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade, Abu Nidal Organization, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hamas and groups associated with these organizations.
Instead of these groups, CPPFG is aligned with the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority (PA). According to PA allied media, the CPPFG's re-launch was "coordinated with the Palestinian General Commission in Canada" and the recent CPPFG inspired-delegation of MPs to the West Bank was organized "in coordination between the Palestinian National Authority."
Heavily dependent on Western funding and Israeli support, the PA hasbeen labeled the "subcontractor of the Occupation" (some believe even that's too charitable, calling the PA "in lock step" with Israel's occupation). Since the Harper government took over in 2006m half a billion dollars in Canadian aid money has gone to the PA in an explicit bid to strengthen it against political rival Hamas and to entrench Israel's occupation.
"There have been increasing references in the past months during high-level bilateral meetings with the Israelis about the importance and value they place on Canada's assistance to the Palestinian Authority, most notably in security/justice reform," read a heavily censored November 2012 note signed by former Canadian International Development Agency president Margaret Biggs. "The Israelis have noted the importance of Canada's contribution to the relative stability achieved through extensive security co-operation between Israel and the Palestinian Authority."
The note released through an Access to Information Request suggests the goal of Canadian "aid" was to protect a corrupt Abbas, whose electoral mandate expired in 2009, from popular backlash. Biggs explained that "the emergence of popular protests on the Palestinian street against the Palestinian Authority is worrying and the Israelis have been imploring the international donor community to continue to support the Palestinian Authority."
The Shin Bet vetted, CIA connected, and Canadian, U.S. and British-trained PA security forces have repeatedly quelled protests opposing Israeli violence in Gaza and expansionism in the West Bank. In the latest iteration, two weeks ago PA forces fired stun grenades and tear gas on a peaceful demonstration calling for the easing of punitive economic measures in Gaza. An Amnesty International staff member was arbitrarily detained and tortured alongside 18 others in what the rights group labeled a "vicious crackdown."
After returning from the recent PA-coordinated visit to the West Bank, Green Party leader Elizabeth May and NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice both said the Palestinians they talked didn't support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (the PA's position). The delegation did not meet anyone from the Palestinian BDS National Committee, which dubs itself "the broadest Palestinian civil society coalition that works to lead and support the BDS movement for Palestinian rights." Nor did they go to Gaza.
Claiming to be dialoguing with both sides through CPPFG and CIIG is a cruel joke. The NDP should heed 200 well-known musicians, academics, trade unionists and party members' call to withdraw from the Canada-Israel Interparliamentary Group.
Image: Wikimedia Commons
Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism.
Thank you for reading this story...
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.
If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.
We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.