Backroom Bureaucracy Won't Stop Corruption

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

About six months ago, the Windsor Street Sobey’s in Halifax called to say I had won the latest Club Sobey’s contest.

That I had even entered was news to me. Apparently shoppers automatically join the fray by proffering their frequent shopper discount card.

“What did I win?”

“A little red wagon.”

When I presented myself at the courtesy booth a few days later, a Sobey’s employee disappeared into the back of the store and emerged a few minutes later wheeling a bright shiny Radio Flyer, complete with removable hardwood sideboards.

It’s a beauty, but my youngest child is 27-years-old, and I’m not a grandfather. Yet.

Valerie will know some deserving kid whose parents couldn’t afford one of these, I thought to myself.

Valerie Patterson teaches the combined primary/grade one class at Boularderie School in Cape Breton. When I called to ask who among her charges coulduse a little red wagon, she surprised me.

“I’ll raffle it off,” she said.

“Raffle it off?” I said.“What will you do with the money?”

“I’ll buy modeling clay. It helps develop their fine motor skills.”

The Boularderie School is a magnificent edifice, recently (and imprudently, in my view) rebuilt at a cost exceeding $5-million. It boasts spacious, well-lit classrooms, a music room, an art room, the latest computers, a library, electronic screens that drop from the ceiling and a combined gymnasium-auditorium with the best acoustics this side of Mabou, Cape Breton’s Strathspey Place.

Yet its teachers can’t get modeling clay (or construction paper, or coloured chalk, or library books) without spending their nights and weekends cadging for cash.

This is the fiscal standard against which salaries and perks for senior school board managers must be judged. It explains why news of superintendent Jack Sullivan’s $48,470 annual mileage allowance touched such a raw nerve in communities from Capstick to Comeauville.

The 1995 amalgamation that cobbled twenty-two local Cape Breton school boards into just seven regional units, left responsible officials remote from the schools, communities, and families they were appointed to serve.

It was next to impossible for parents or teachers to get them on the phone, let alone pry bucks for art supplies or library purchases out of them.

To the extent anyone has tried to defend the salaries we pay senior education bureaucrats, they have relied on surveys of similar sized boards in other provinces.

Since Nova Scotia schoolteachers, coalminers, store clerks, X-ray technologists, and brain surgeons have never made as much as their Ontario or Alberta counterparts, it’s hard to argue that superintendents and chief financial officers should.

That such officials would bypass already generous salary guidelines with such subterfuge as phony car allowances and continuing education funds amounts to a betrayal of trust.

The Strait Regional School Board paid huge sums of money in this manner, while elected board members and provincial bureaucrats averted their gaze.

The scandal is further complicated by the favoured bureaucrats’ intricate connections to the failed Knowledge House, a multi-million dollar technology supplier to the board.

The province has since called in forensic auditors and the board called the cops. So far, so good.

But what’s needed to prevent such abuses from flowering again the next time the public’s backs are turned?

Education Minister Jane Purves seems to be toying with the notion that all future problems can be solved by putting board finances under the direct control of the province.

Or perhaps by imposing yet another restructuring of school governance.

These are bad ideas.

The myth that great efficiencies can be achieved by monkeying with the number and size of bureaucratic units — whether in education, healthcare or municipal government — has cast its seductive spell on both the last Liberal administration and the present Conservative crew.

The result has been tremendous turmoil, calamitous transitional costs, and little evidence of long-term savings.

Whether we should have seven boards or twenty-two, or one or none is an interesting academic debate, but the solid fact is we can’t afford the disruption of yet another restructuring.

Nor are provincial bureaucrats inherently less corruptible than local yokels.

What’s needed to insure against future corruption is more openness.

If elected board members had been required to ratify Sullivan’s contract in an open meeting, it would never have happened. Instead, the board would have saved hundreds of thousands of dollars it could have spent on modeling clay and other necessities of day-to-day learning.

If Purves wants meaningful reform, she should pass legislation requiring school boards to conduct their business in public.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.