Nova Scotia Premier Hamm: On the Ropes

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

As a re-election strategy, beating up on Florence Nightingale seemsless than shrewd. To take on Nightingale and find oneself on thereceiving end of a sound thrashing shows special ineptitude.

For two weeks, Premier John Hamm's Tories have been on the ropes,absorbing blow after blow in the ring of public opinion. Theirill-conceived plan to impose below-market wages and working conditionson health-care workers has met nearly universal public disapproval.

On Thursday night, Hamm found himself flat on the canvas, blinkingback stars, the sound of the ref's count ringing in his ears.

On that chaotic evening, his government lost control of thelegislative timetable, ensuring that 2,900 health-care workers will beable to strike at least two days before government can order themback.

It will take more days of dire threats to get them to comply,followed by work-to-rule campaigns or mass resignations that willcripple the province's largest hospitals.

Much of the credit for derailing Bill 68 belongs to an adroitmanoeuvre by Nova Scotia Government and General Employees' Union (NSGEU) president JoanJessome.

The bill had made it through first and second reading and had beenreferred to the Law Amendments Committee, where hundreds of citizenslined up to condemn it. The order paper called for the committee toreport to the house by 8 p.m. Thursday, in time for the legislature toschedule debate by the committee of the whole, beginning 12:01 a.m.Friday.

At 2 p.m., after hearing only a third of the 500 people signed up tospeak, Justice Minister Michael Baker cut off public presentations.

Jessome offered the government what appeared to be a face-saving wayto avoid cutting off public participation. Let the hearings continue,she said, and we will delay the mandatory 48-hour strike notice untileveryone has had a chance to speak.

The Tories didn't relish more days of hearings in which sympatheticnurses would tearfully denounce them. But neither did they want toappear to be gagging the public.

So they adjourned for two hours to consider their options. Theyquickly realized that 48 hours wouldn't give them enough time to pushthe bill through. In effect, Jessome was offering 48 hours in returnfor a procedural change that would chew up 72.

So the Tories rejected the compromise, but offered one of their own.They would allow another day of hearings if the opposition would agreeto pass the bill by Tuesday night.

After another adjournment, the Opposition said no, followed by morewrangling over the details of the Tory proposal, a slightly revisedproposal, another adjournment to consider it, and another oppositionrefusal. The manoeuvring saw unheard of co-operation between normallyhostile NDP and Liberal MLAs, united by a desire to run out the clock.

Suddenly, it was 7:30, without a vote having taken place on any ofthe opposition amendments, or the government amendment, to the bill.Baker came to the belated realization he'd been hornswoggled byopposition stalling.

Baker panicked and, amid rising chaos, gavelled through a vote thatreported the bill back to the House for third reading. In a violationof house rules, he refused opposition demands for a recorded vote, oreven for a clarification of what was being voted upon.

That set the stage for Speaker Murray Scott to rule on what NDP MLAJohn Holm describes as the first point of privilege to succeed in his17 years in the house. After a 90-minute discussion with Houseleaders, Scott ruled Baker had violated MLAs' privileges, and sent thematter back to committee.

That meant the committee couldn't report back until Friday, whichmeant committee of the whole can't meet until tomorrow, and Bill 68likely can't be passed before Thursday.

Scott's ruling deserves special notice. In a highly charged politicalcontext, it took courage for a Speaker to rule against his own party,with what is obviously a devastating result for its strategy on a keyissue.

Scott also deserves praise for curbing his police officer's instinct forsecurity, and heeding those who cautioned him to respect theimportance of citizen access to Province House.

With a few exceptions, the hospital workers likewise deserve praisefor their restrained approach to confrontations with governmentministers. The ability of citizens to engage the highest officials ofthe province in face-to-face is a democratic treasure.

In the face of these defeats, Hamm has shown no readiness to backdown from the untenable position he staked out two weeks ago. Perhapsthe weekend break will give him time to reflect on the collisioncourse he has set for the province and its health-care workers.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.