... the ranting of twits like yourself....
It was the court of appeal that affirmed the decision, and subsequently overturned by the Supreme Court on appeal.
I'll return to your childish namecalling in a moment.
First, what is it about the following English phrase that is unclear?
[emphasis added, for those who get very upset instead of remaining calm] [b][i]Held (Iacobucci, Major, Arbour and LeBel JJ. dissenting): The appeal should be dismissed.[/i][/b]
The appeal was "DISMISSED". By the Supreme Court. All the lower court decisions were upheld. All the levels of court - Superior Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court - were in agreement.
And how come you forgot to comment on the Criminal Law excerpt which shows that your thesis was totally wrong? Why don't you just say - as many babblers do, when they were mistaken: [b]SORRY, I WAS MISTAKEN. LET'S MOVE ON.[/b]
Do you actually think that just because you don't like me (or, more correctly, my positions and stands on Afghanistan and other issues), that people will take your word for something when they can [b]read for themselves[/b] that the opposite is true?
You're losing it severely, my friend. Don't call me names, because it's a sign of impotence. And don't particularly do so in defending some scummy creep who was seen murdering a wounded Afghan. It doesn't look good on you.