TPP is the one to oppose given what I've heard about big pharma and the jeopardizing of any potential future pharmacare program. And I certainly trust Mulcair far more than Trudeau or Freeland on it. Don't you agree Pondering that Trudeau and Freeland aren't nearly as trustworthy on this issue as Mulcair? There's no comparison!
No. Mulcair would sign it if the US does because he would be afraid of not getting re-elected. That's why he shut up about ISDS. Maybe he would up the pay-off to the dairy and auto industries.
He wouldn't even table it. And you know full well from the CETA thread that the NDP is questioning the negotiator of CETA about ISDS. A direct quote from the Hansard. Now, the answer was interesting, and certainly presents some issues. But obviously the NDP are asking these questions. And clearly neither Freeland nor Trudeau or the Liberals are directing the negotiator away from ISDS. You've seen that exchange. It's right in the thread.
I don't know which thread on CETA you are referring to. I have repeatedly stated that Freeland is pushing CETA and Canada is standing in the way of dropping or changing the ISDS chapter. That is why it is urgent that the NDP gets loud on CETA which I have now been saying for years. If the NDP had done so I would have voted for Mulcair not Trudeau.