- Closing... By: Lou Arab (Feb 22 2010 - 9:44am)
- Check the dates, epaulo13. By: Unionist (Feb 22 2010 - 8:54am)
- ..wow! i thought that PR was By: epaulo13 (Feb 22 2010 - 8:49am)
- spam By: Pm24KRISTIN (Feb 22 2010 - 8:07am)
- melovesproles By: ReeferMadness (Mar 11 2009 - 9:28pm)
- Brookmeere, I have to wonder By: melovesproles (Mar 11 2009 - 2:09pm)
- I have never suggested that By: madmax (Mar 11 2009 - 1:32pm)
- madmax wrote:No...I am By: brookmere (Mar 11 2009 - 12:55pm)
- No...I am suggesting that By: madmax (Mar 11 2009 - 10:08am)
- The way things are, the GP By: brookmere (Mar 11 2009 - 8:56am)
- NorthReport wrote: Has By: Wilf Day (Mar 10 2009 - 11:09pm)
- Brian White wrote: That By: ReeferMadness (Mar 10 2009 - 9:54pm)
- We seem to be circling the By: ReeferMadness (Mar 10 2009 - 6:53pm)
- Well Campbell has limited By: Brian White (Mar 10 2009 - 12:23pm)
- Something doesn't feel right By: madmax (Mar 9 2009 - 6:12pm)
- O Crap. The e may ding By: Brian White (Mar 7 2009 - 12:56pm)
- Quote:And, i hope that once By: melovesproles (Mar 3 2009 - 1:56pm)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Mar 2 2009 - 4:58pm)
- I wouldn't vote for May By: melovesproles (Mar 2 2009 - 4:45pm)
- And another reason why I By: Fidel (Mar 2 2009 - 4:26pm)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Mar 2 2009 - 4:20pm)
- I was surprised by EMay in By: Fidel (Mar 2 2009 - 4:12pm)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Mar 2 2009 - 3:17pm)
- Quote:That has nothing to do By: melovesproles (Mar 2 2009 - 3:04pm)
- I never said that electoral By: Stockholm (Mar 2 2009 - 2:35pm)
- Quote:The federal NDP is By: melovesproles (Mar 2 2009 - 1:46pm)
- The federal NDP is 100% By: Stockholm (Mar 2 2009 - 12:33pm)
- Quote:I think maybe we By: melovesproles (Mar 2 2009 - 11:50am)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Mar 2 2009 - 10:44am)
- BC NDP MP's have just as By: brookmere (Mar 2 2009 - 4:35am)
- I think Campbell is an ahole By: Brian White (Mar 2 2009 - 2:38am)
- Rick Anderson, who seems to By: melovesproles (Feb 28 2009 - 4:24pm)
- My thanks to Wilf Day in By: Brian White (Feb 20 2009 - 10:26pm)
- Here are some charts of how By: Brian White (Feb 16 2009 - 12:56am)
- So why did his wife speak in By: Brian White (Feb 12 2009 - 3:30am)
- You are not responsible for By: Brian White (Feb 12 2009 - 3:18am)
- If the NDP become the By: Brian White (Feb 12 2009 - 3:06am)
- Brian White wrote: I am By: Coyote (Feb 12 2009 - 12:00am)
- Stockholm wrote: That By: Fidel (Feb 11 2009 - 5:28pm)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Feb 11 2009 - 4:48pm)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Darwin OConnor (Feb 11 2009 - 4:42pm)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Feb 11 2009 - 4:06pm)
- Stockholm wrote:I'm still By: scott (Feb 11 2009 - 5:48pm)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Feb 11 2009 - 2:00pm)
- Quote:I'm going to ask it By: melovesproles (Feb 11 2009 - 1:33am)
- melovesproles wrote:Its sad By: Fartful Codger (Feb 11 2009 - 1:03am)
- Why not promote some kind of By: Machjo (Feb 10 2009 - 10:06pm)
- Yeah, why not hide behind an By: Brian White (Feb 10 2009 - 9:59pm)
- I am glad that you are By: Brian White (Feb 10 2009 - 9:53pm)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: melovesproles (Feb 9 2009 - 2:42am)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Coyote (Feb 8 2009 - 9:08pm)
- Daniel Grice wrote:The By: Fartful Codger (Feb 8 2009 - 9:02pm)
- Brian, I'm going to ignore By: Coyote (Feb 8 2009 - 8:04pm)
- Who told you we think 40% is By: Brian White (Feb 8 2009 - 8:01pm)
- Additionally, all the BC By: Daniel Grice (Feb 8 2009 - 7:32pm)
- How is it coherent for the By: Brian White (Feb 8 2009 - 7:31pm)
- The standard BC referendum By: Daniel Grice (Feb 8 2009 - 7:27pm)
- melovesproles By: Fartful Codger (Feb 8 2009 - 5:49pm)
- Quote:I've always been By: melovesproles (Feb 8 2009 - 4:50pm)
- It's still not clear. What By: scott (Feb 8 2009 - 4:40pm)
- I've always been intrigued By: Coyote (Feb 8 2009 - 4:35pm)
- Quote: The BCNDP has a By: melovesproles (Feb 8 2009 - 4:29pm)
- Um, Carol James' response is By: Coyote (Feb 8 2009 - 4:18pm)
- Nancy emailed James about By: Brian White (Feb 8 2009 - 4:08pm)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Coyote (Feb 8 2009 - 3:39pm)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Feb 8 2009 - 2:09pm)
- The strange thing is that By: Brian White (Feb 8 2009 - 5:40am)
- Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: melovesproles (Feb 8 2009 - 5:28am)
- BOTH political parties have By: Brian White (Feb 8 2009 - 5:26am)
- Peter, you are a jerk. The By: Brian White (Feb 8 2009 - 5:18am)
- This conversation is getting By: NorthReport (Feb 6 2009 - 3:31am)
- Fidel wrote: They want to By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 1:13am)

Pro rep IS NDP policy. The NDP should be one national party, very short term local interests should not thrump the long term national interest.
I think, Brian, that some of the resistance to your position generally is that this comment misrepresents the structure and functioning of the NDP. It suggests that the provincial NDP (here the BC NDP) should somehow submit to the federal NDP, rather than that the provincial parties exists as co-equals with the federal party.
It is entirely appropriate for individual MPs to comment on political issues facing the provincial parties. While it would be acceptable for the federal leader to also comment, I would suggest that there are more important things upon which the federal leader should focus his attention.