Activity Based Funding won't solve waitlists and overcrowding in hospitals: study

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Activity Based Funding won't solve waitlists and overcrowding in hospitals, creates barriers to needed reforms: study

Vancouver -- As Canada's premiers meet in Victoria to discuss different approaches to health system reform, a new study raises serious concerns about "Activity Based Funding" (ABF), a new funding model that pays hospitals based on the number of surgeries they perform.

ABF has been introduced in B.C. and is being considered in Alberta, Quebec and Ontario. However, research evidence from the U.S., U.K. and Europe shows that ABF's narrow focus on increasing "activity" in one part of the health-care system does not address the system-level changes needed to control health-care costs and improve patient care.

Beyond the Hospital Walls: Activity Based Funding Versus Integrated Health Care Reform focuses on the use of ABF in B.C., but its findings are applicable to other provinces as well. Key findings include:

- ABF fails to address the root causes of overcrowding and long waitlists: lack of accessible, effective community-based services for people with chronic illnesses, such as the frail elderly or mental health patients. These patients often end up in hospital, "blocking" beds.
- ABF is designed to increase volume by rewarding "activity" but does not focus on improving patient care. In fact, ABF creates an incentive to focus on lower-risk patients and procedures and can lead to the under-treatment of people with higher, more complex needs.
- ABF is complex to administer; the international evidence that it improves cost-efficiencies in hospitals is at best mixed, and in many jurisdictions it has led to increased costs.
- ABF can be used to encourage competition among hospitals and private clinics, creating barriers to collaboration and service integration.

In contrast, successful health-care system reform initiatives in other jurisdictions have focused on integrating hospitals with primary-care family doctors and community care seniors' homes, community clinics, etc. These systems have prioritized collaboration across sectors, co-ordination of services, improving patient experience and clinical outcomes, and reducing the inappropriate use of high-cost emergency and in-patient hospital services. These more integrated systems have been most effective in improving quality of care and controlling cost increases.

Lead author Marcy Cohen says that in spite of the federal government's recent rejection of a leadership role in health-care reform, a national strategy is essential for ensuring long-term sustainability of our public health-care system. "We're hoping that the premiers will come together to take a broad look at how to make changes that will lead to system-wide improvements in patient care, instead of focusing narrowly on changing only one part of the health system or on privatizing care. What's needed is a visionary Canada-wide plan based on solid evidence from successful health-care systems internationally."

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.