A popular uprising in Bolivia is defending its government and democratic institutions against U.S.-inspired minority violence.

On September 23, about 20,000 peasants and miners marched on the eastern city of Santa Cruz, where the right-wing government has been encouraging terrorism and intimidation of Boliviaâe(TM)s indigenous majority and trying to oust the government of President Evo Morales.

Popular assemblies in La Paz, Cochabamba and elsewhere in the country added to the pressure against this disruptive minority, whose supporters have killed dozens of Bolivians in recent weeks. The right-wing oppositionâe(TM)s banner is âeoeautonomyâe for the provinces they rule, but their real goal is to return the rich oligarchy to power.

Morales, a man of peace, has refrained from using armed force against such illegality, seeking a dialogue with right-wing leaders and peaceful resolution of differences.

Morales, Boliviaâe(TM)s first indigenous president, was confirmed in office by a 67 per cent majority in a national referendum in August. He was first elected in 2005 on a program including land reform, nationalization of natural resources and a new constitution.

The Morales government acted vigorously on all three fronts, but progress has been stymied by forces loyal to the countryâe(TM)s previous ruling elite and their backers in Washington. U.S. ambassador Philip Goldberg brazenly proclaimed his right to intervene in Bolivian political life. He met frequently with opposition leaders until Bolivia expelled him from the country September 10 for âeoeconspiring against democracy.âe

Among the causes of opposition outrage is the governmentâe(TM)s decision to use some of profits from gas exports to fund the countryâe(TM)s first universal pension plan.

Even more provocative to rich oligarchs is the Morales governmentâe(TM)s goal of ending the centuries-old exclusion of indigenous people. Their goal is to refound the nation on a âeoeplurinationalâe basis âe” that is one of equality between each of Boliviaâe(TM)s indigenous nations and its Hispanic population.

Bolivian popular movements incorporate traditional indigenous values of collectivism and protection of the natural environment. Together with their government, they seek to rebuild Bolivia around these values, while urgently recommending them to the world at large.

For example, in addressing the United Nations General Assembly September 23, Morales warned, âeoeIf we continue the way we were, we will all be responsible for destroying the planet.âe He proposed 10 principles to save life on earth, beginning with âeoeputting an end to capitalism, the synonym for exploitation and pillage.âe

Morales urged âeoerespect for Mother Nature, which is not a commodity,âe and called for taking energy, water and other basic services out of the hands of private business, making them public services and human rights. Our goal, he said, must be âeoeliving well,âe an indigenous concept that includes living in harmony with oneâe(TM)s community and the natural world.

In Bolivia, Moralesâe(TM)s overwhelming victory in the August referendum opened the road for a vote to adopt the proposed constitution, scheduled for December 7. It was this prospect that drove rightists into a frenzy of violence and law-breaking over the last month. On September 11, rightist gangs massacred more than 30 unarmed government supporters in the state of Pando.

The Santa Cruz marchers delivered their warning on September 23 and stopped short of taking the city. Meanwhile, the popular upsurge continues, strengthening Moralesâe(TM)s hand against the violent minority.

But what of the foreign backers of this opposition in Washington?

As Morales said at the United Nations, âeoeThe combat of our people is a historic struggle against empire.âe Here Bolivia has received decisive support from the other peoples of Latin America. On September 15, an emergency meeting of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) voted unanimously to pledge âeoefullest and decided support for the constitutional government of President Evo Morales.âe

The U.S. government has been shut out of these deliberations. The Organization of American States (OAS), to which Canada belongs, has played no role. The government of Stephen Harper has said not a word about the political terrorism in Bolivia.

Itâe(TM)s high time for Canadians to follow the South American example, declare their independence of the Bush-Harper combination, and take their stand in support of Boliviaâe(TM)s government, democratic institutions and integrity.